Why do we so easily identify the rich landlord in Jesus’ parable with God? Why do we call his actions benevolence and grace? And why, so often, do we instinctively take the side of the rich and powerful in Jesus’ stories?
Perhaps we have been reading from the wrong seat.
Jeepney hermeneutics asks us to read Scripture from inside the cramped and noisy jeepney—not from one of the landlords imported SUVs, where the "arawan" (day laborers) commute looking for work.
A denarius was not a bonus. It was subsistence wage: enough wheat for one person for one day, or barley enough for three. Just bread. Nothing more. The arawan lived from one day to the next.
So why did those who worked twelve hours grumble? Because they expected more when they saw those who worked only one hour receive the same denarius. They hoped this landlord might be different. They hoped he would recognize that twelve hours of labor should mean more than one day’s subsistence.
But the landlord was not different.
He used the denarius to divide the arawan. He took one aside and reminded him of his supposed generosity. He turned the workers against one another while protecting his own wealth.
This is where the parable unsettles us.
Perhaps it is not a story about God’s generosity at all. Perhaps it is a story exposing how wealth exercises power: by controlling wages, dividing workers, and calling exploitation generosity.
Jesus preached good news to the anawim—the poor, the vulnerable, and those whose survival depends on tomorrow’s work. Yes, the anawim include the arawan.
So let us stop demonizing the arawan for grumbling. Maybe their grumbling is a collective recognition that something is very wrong. Maybe their grumbling is the sound of justice demanding to be heard.
Photo: "Day Laborers Brought in by Truck from Nearby Towns" by Wolcott, Marion Post, 1910-1990 (from the vanderbilt divinity library digital archives).
#ChooseJustice
#ClemencyForMaryJane
#FreePalestine
#JusticeForMyanmar
#LoveGodServePeople
#NoToPaxSilica